12/29/2023 0 Comments Nisus thesaurus mac![]() However, this group test was about a wider range of needs, and for that, Pages edges it, with its mix of efficiency, elegance, tools and features. The problem is that Nisus Writer Pro and Pages beat it in some key areas.įor pure writing, Nisus Writer Pro is the better application, and we wholeheartedly recommend it for such tasks. The interface is better aligned with Mac standards, the layout features are improved, its range of templates is decent, and the Home and Student edition of Office 2008 for Mac is surprisingly reasonably priced. Of the final three, Microsoft Word is steadily (but slowly) improving. So if your needs are purely text-based, it's the best application on test – the relatively low rating is purely down to its lack of layout capabilities and Office integration. Indeed, this is made clear in the software's blurb. Strictly speaking, it's an authoring tool whose output should be sent to a word processor for final layout. To be fair to Scrivener, it's not really a word processor and is the odd one out here. Next down – and it pains us to say this – is Scrivener. For a free application, it's mightily impressive, but you get what you pay for. Mellel excels at document structuring and cross-referencing, but it's too idiosyncratic and clunky to recommend, and 's standout property is its lack of a price tag. Two applications fall at the first hurdle in our race for the word processor crown. And of the other three, there's very little between them – Pages, Nisus Writer Pro and Scrivener all show an admirable understanding of Mac conventions, with Scrivener fractionally doing so in the most pleasing manner. sadly apes Word in these regards, not least in its inability to use C and the up and down arrows to jump to the start and end of a document.Įlsewhere, Mellel uses Mac OS X conventions and widgets, but presents them in a way that's akin to an unholy union between iTunes and BBEdit. A pity, then, that once you get away from the main window, Word appears transitionary, with inconsistent dialogs, an ignorance of common Mac shortcuts and a lack of support for built-in services. ![]() On the face of it, Word finally looks and feels like a Mac OS X application. Microsoft sometimes pays scant regard to such things, but the latest Word is an improvement. You expect things to work in a certain way across every application and for common conventions to be adhered to. One reason for using a Mac is interface consistency. In terms of exporting back to Word, advanced styling could still be lost occasionally, but again Pages nosed in front of. DOCX-wise, however, Pages' blunders were less of an issue. Neither application got things entirely right: both were confused by Word template cover pages, and while Pages floundered with text styles, couldn't correctly deal with image styles and placement. Surprisingly, lags behind Apple's Pages. Nisus Writer Pro also grabbed tables (if not their styling) from DOCX files and made a stab at including images and layout from DOCs, but generally messed things up. And results proved variable with the DOC and DOCX files we tested.Įvery app bar Mellel managed to rip text from our documents (Mellel was fine with DOC files, but stumbled when confronted with DOCX), although Scrivener managed nothing further. ![]() Although using an alternative to Word is fine, there's a chance you'll occasionally need to open, edit and save documents created using Microsoft's application.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |